Posted on 05/30/2005 12:47:24 PM PDT by LS
There is some merit to separation being a concern of the Founding era. The history of the English Civil War of the 1600s was well known to the American colonists - warring factions had included Anglican Arminians, English Calvinists, Scots Irish Presbyterians, and Irish Catholics. A lot of the American colonial population were descended from religious groups who set sail as a result of that Civil War.
The New England colonies were hostile to non-Congregationalists. Virginia had the Church of England as its State Church. Dissenting groups, Baptists, Methodists, and so forth were very wary of having a new State Church establish itself after the Revolution.
Hardly. You evidently have not taken a look at Calvin's Insitutes. Calvin considered himself Luther's student. Both had been Catholics prior to the Reformation, both were greatly influenced by Augustine's writings.
Indeed--yet today it sends task forces to the AirForce academy to document complaints against Christians-Go figure.None of our public institutions I am aware of have
remained true to their foundations especially among the schools that trace a history back prior to the War Between the States.
And Harvard has the infamous Peter Gomes -a homosexual who
thinks one can be a good Christian and unrepentant homosexual at th esame time--and says most people don't know
how to read the Bible. Typical of the Reprobate aint it.
Moot point -have not verified it - But I recall the motto was Veritas Christo et Ecclesia Truth, Christ and the Church.
The intelligence of children is very underestimated. My mother came from a brit colony where everyone of a certain primary school age had to learn latin for church. Do you know of any government school teaching elementary school kids latin? I don't.
"Separation of church and State" by Philip Hamburger, (Law Professor at the University of Chicago)University of Harvard Press ,2000; see also "thomas Jefferson and the Wall of Separation between church and State" by Daniel Dreisbach ,New York University Press,2000;See also Library of Congress display "Christianity and the Founding of the
American Republic,1998James H.Hutson-to name a few,
And Law was more honorable then-lawyers closer to the Divine Law.
They were also all men. White men.
Oh the humanity....
Mugs is suffering from Romans 1:21 syndrom.
Your list calls John Adams a "Unitarian." I sincerely doubt this.
Can you imagine a ................."Pastor Al Gore"?!?!?!?!!!!
Exactly. Those who deliberately suppress self-evident truth - deceiving themselves and others - have no excuse.
Oh, I agree. I'm just saying that the manifestations of the Spirit really came after the 2nd Great Awakening and the appearance of these itinerant ministers. Indeed, the old Anglican/Episcopalian way was to NOT show your emotions.
That's it. I knew I'd read this somewhere.
Nope, and even worse, the private prep schools that once prided themselves on requiring Latin are giving it up. Course, on the other hand, our kids can all speak "rap" and "ghetto," which is much more difficult :)
The Founders were---but not all religious leaders were. Remember Anne Hutchinson?
It is not my list, but the facts seem to support it.
Do you have evidence to the contrary?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.