No, you go through gyrations to maintain your own interpretation, and then call this "the biblical approach".
I've already seen how you are willing to come up with absurdities in order to maintain your literalist reading. There is really nothing more to discuss if you are unable to see that your reading of scripture is interpretive.
I never said it wasn't interpretive. It is interpretive based upon solid reasoning though. The normal use of DAY when included with the qualifiers is a 24 hour period of time. To say otherwise is eisegesis not exegesis. Looks like our discussion is at an end.