[CarolinaGuitarman]

"A lot you know.

If I hated women, why would I want to own one?"


Because you are a woman-hating pig? You have already on other posts stated you thought it perfectly legit to rape a woman who enters a man's house/apartment because she would have consented to sex. You called them whores and prostitutes. You call yourself *The Age of Reason*, yet that age was in part a revolt against the irrationality of people like you. You're a primitive loving tribalist, revolting completely against the modern world. Modern as in since civilization. You are a disgrace to FR.

[Age of Reason]

For the last time, that is not what I said.

For example, I said that society (which of course includes women members of that society) should regard a woman's entering a man's home unchaperoned, as consenting to sex.

There are all forms of communication.

A woman may say or write the word, "yes," or she may consent by a recognized sign, such as nodding her head.

Or getting undressed and climbing into bed with a man. Perhaps you would say that also is rape, saying that a woman climbing naked into bed with a man is merely looking to take a nap.

I suggest that a woman entering a man's home unchaperoned as be adopted by society as a similar sign of consent.

And once so recognized by our society--a woman entering a man's home unchaperoned will know that she is consenting to having sex with the man, and so it is not rape.

So since you either cannot read or willfully misrepresent me, I will no longer respond to your posts.