Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DMZFrank; Rca2000
There WILL NOT be a single standard for men and women because it will have to be lowered to accomodate women. If it is kept high enough to adequately test men than we will not have the numbers of women that the Patsy Schroeder types and DACOWITS feel are politically acceptable. This situation with women is largely POLITICAL and NOT impelled by military necessity!!!!

Unfortunatly, you are correct. The "femilezis" (if I may borrow your term, RCA2000) will not go for it. I did offer my plan to hopefully accomodate both sides of the issue but the Patsy Schroeder types will still think my plan does not go too far. I still stick to my guns though, "if you wanna be a combat soldier you gotta pass the tests as well as pull their weight." This is a good case where somebody should just tell the femilezis to "sit down and shut up." Political correctness will be our downfall, what worries me is that the PC crowd will do the same thing in Iraq as we did in Vietnam.
102 posted on 05/30/2005 7:27:44 PM PDT by Nowhere Man (Lutheran, Conservative, Neo-Victorian/Edwardian, Michael Savage in '08! - DeCAFTA-nate CAFTA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: Nowhere Man

Yes, you, and anyone else who wants to, including Rush, if he hears it, may use that term.(so long as no one forgest where it came from.My little contribution to the lexicon of America.) I think it fits many women, including some so-called conservative women, who want to be feminists ,too.

As for the current discussion, I will plead the 5th amendment,EXCEPT to say, that it apperas there is another troll aboard.


103 posted on 05/30/2005 10:50:24 PM PDT by Rca2000 (America, oh America, I MISS YOU!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: Nowhere Man

I think that the primary problem with the women in the military issue is that most people cannot fathom the difference between women in combat and women in the military. People will claim that there are no front lines in war anymore, and that is true to some degree, but there are certainly areas that are more dangerous than others. There is a place for women in our hospitals and our offices. In spite of the claims of "no front lines" our hospitals and offices are not getting attacked. The fighting is mostly in the cities and occasionally on the supply routes. Women should not serve in combat arms units or in combat support units that venture into harms way. They can make a worthwhile and appropriate contribution in our hospitals and offices.


104 posted on 05/31/2005 4:19:50 AM PDT by Axhandle (AHS MilBlog: http://www.airbornehogsociety.com/blog/index.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson