Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Senate ) Compromise could hurt Democrats in battle over Supreme Court
Kansas City Star ^ | Sat, May. 28, 2005 | DICK POLMAN Knight Ridder Newspapers

Posted on 05/28/2005 7:36:14 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; MeekOneGOP; Admin Moderator
MikalD1313 seems to be an interesting poster....seems to need some examination....

Looks like the mods gave him the examination all right...

He's "banned or suspended".

61 posted on 05/29/2005 2:22:25 PM PDT by ErnBatavia (I don't drink and FReep...it just looks that way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia

Good!


62 posted on 05/29/2005 2:25:12 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: MikalD1313

Finally, let me point out that exercising the Nuclear Option to change the senate rules will require an "unfair" breaking of the Senate rules on rules changes.



Naw...... the precendent of that approach was established by the esteemed democrat Senator Byrd several years ago.

You are no longer around but you may read this and help enlighten your education.


63 posted on 05/29/2005 2:28:28 PM PDT by deport (Women always get the last say in an argument.. anything after that is the start of a new argument)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia; MikalD1313
Bye, MikalD1313.

"He's dead, Jim!"


64 posted on 05/30/2005 2:37:11 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I think he would actually enjoy a big fight with the Democrats

All Real Americans Love to Fight, said another George (Patton). That most certainly includes President George Walker Bush.

65 posted on 05/31/2005 4:17:59 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
How in the heck could the dems use the "extraordinary circumstances" excuse on her anymore?

By shear obstructionism. They'd also argue that she shouldn't be changing jobs, having so recently been put on the DC Appeals Court.

66 posted on 05/31/2005 4:20:47 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Many analysts are asking: How can Democrats credibly invoke "extraordinary circumstances" against a conservative nominee for the Supreme Court

What a joke. You have to laugh when you see credibility and Democrat in the same sentence. The Dems wouldn't hesitate to declare "extraordinary circumstances" for any reason at all. They will not be constrained by this clause in the least.

67 posted on 05/31/2005 4:35:44 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Absolutely right!

So Dubya should move Janice Brown right on up to the Supreme Court, maybe all three of them ....


68 posted on 05/31/2005 5:16:31 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson