'SOME' people?
Let me ask you a (not-so) rhetorical question:
You are a Christian minister who is terribly conflicted because despite your Church's teachings you yearn to be with many women. This is the early 1800s, and you ain't gonna be popular if that comes out.
Then, in a stroke of a (sort-of) genious, you take a religious NOVEL that was penned by your Mother and rejected by publishers, pretend that it is your divinely-inspired translation of a standard Egyptian Hieroglyphic text that no one could (conveniently) understand at the time, and then pass off that novel as a new Revelation of Jesus Christ, leading you to declare yourself the head of the Church based on this new 'Revelation'.
Conveniently, you can now marry many women (though you will be lynched for propagating these views), but your 'disciples' will survive to continue your Church.
Now, if YOU did all that, would you still call yourself a 'Christian'?
Islam, Mormonism and Freudism all sprang from their inventor's desire to have unrestricted sex with as many women as he desired. All three inventors created new religions that allowed them to fulfill these desires. As crazy as it sounds, this is the background of these three cults boiled down to its most elemental part.
All else was just 'window-dressing'.
Occam's Razor still works.
