Skip to comments.San Diego: City's Credit Rating Sinks Again
Posted on 05/28/2005 11:12:33 AM PDT by John Jorsett
One of the three major credit rating firms ratcheted the city of San Diego's credit rating down another notch Friday, yanking the city to the investment quality of a mid-sized city with a troubled economy.
Although the nation's seventh largest city as a whole continues to flourish economically, political and budgetary unrest continue to wilt the city government's once-vibrant credit worthiness, Fitch Ratings analysts concluded.
A statement from Fitch cited the continued lack of audited 2003 and 2004 financial statements and the numerous ongoing investigations into city business as the reason for its fourth action on San Diego's credit rating in the last year-and-a-half. It also cited talk of bankruptcy by City Attorney Mike Aguirre and mayoral candidates in its explanation.
In the immediate future, the downgrade essentially means little for day-to-day business at City Hall. The city currently has no access to public financial markets because outside auditors haven't yet certified its financial statements form 2003 or 2004 amid concerns of errors and omission in financial statements and political wrongdoing.
"There aren't a lot of people that have really strong economies and good revenue bases and are in such a leadership and political void," said Amy Doppelt of Fitch Ratings.
Fitch first lowered San Diego's rating from AAA to AA in early 2004 for its general obligation bonds. In September, it put the city on a negative watch after the release of an investigation into the city's financial disclosure process. The city then was moved to A in February.
Friday's downgrade leaves the city's general obligation bonds at a BBB-plus rating.
Junk bond rating is considered BB-plus. The city's lowest rated bonds, which are $250 million in leased back debt, are now ranked one step above junk status as BBB-minus.
Owner of San Diego bonds will also likely have a tougher time trading, Doppelt said. The city's rating could rebound with a healthy audit, she added.
"Fitch's rating action reflects the city's continued delay in releasing its fiscal year 2003 and 2004 audit and the negative effect the ongoing political conflicts and upcoming election have on the city's ability to resolve its sizable financial challenges," said the Fitch statement.
After being admonished by Fitch for their lack of leadership and political consensus, city officials lashed out at each other for causing the downgrade.
City Manager Lamont Ewell and Councilmen Scott Peters and Jim Madaffer, who are political enemies of Aguirre's, seized on the tidbit from the Fitch statement that cited the city attorney. Likewise, Aguirre blamed the mayor and council for continuing to honor a decade's worth of pension benefits he believes to be illegal.
"All of us need to be about solving the problem, and not about pointing fingers at each other and laying the blame," Peters said.
Aguirre said consensus building begins with integrity.
The city's pension deficit is estimated to be between $1.37 billion and $2 billion. The political machinations that led to the deficit, as well as the failure to report it to investors, have prompted parallel probes by the U.S. Attorney's Office and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The audit's release still hinges on the completion of an investigation into city politics and finances by outside forensic auditors, as well as the waiver of attorney-client privilege by the pension board.
To date, the pension board has denied investigators access to documents pertinent to the investigation.
Ewell said in a statement that he anticipates similar action by Moody's Investors Service, as well. Standard and Poor's Ratings, the other major ratings firm, suspended San Diego's rating in fall 2004.
"It also cited talk of bankruptcy by City Attorney Mike Aguirre and mayoral candidates..."
When they start to use the word "bankruptcy" you know it is inevitable. Maybe the State of California will eventually get the message that runaway spending is not a good policy unless you are willing to pay the confiscatory taxes that are needed to support it.
As Phil Hendrie once said, San Diego is about as close to Honolulu as a decapitated fly is to Albert Einstein.
I can just imagine when all the baby boomer government workers retire. At 80% of their highest earning year of course.. and maybe the killer full health benefits through old age for them and their family.
Its sad but in some areas if you literally eliminated say schooling, it wouldn't dramatically reduce the education budget.. As in some cases 50% of the budget is pensions, and most of the rest of the teachers and administrators are near retirement, so would get pensions anyway.
And maybe more worrying its also in things like the CIA.
Only one of the serious candidates (Pat Shea) is saying bankruptcy. He was involved in climbing Orange County out of its fiscal meltdown in the 90's and his wife Diane was the one on the pension board that blew the whistle on San Diego's fraudulent practices. The others are rearranging deck chairs or saying "golly gee, I don't know enough yet but elect me anyway."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.