[A.J.Armitage]

No naturalist I know of thinks humans are 'random, meaningless aggregations of atoms'. Can't you crusaders for morality muster even a smidgen of intellectual honesty?

That the naturalists you know are too cowardly or thoughtless to follow their ideas to the necessary conclusion isn't my fault. It seems they would prefer to borrow some idea of the dignity of man from Christianity, which only means they find something attractive in Christianity, or rather in the cultural residue of Christianity. But how long can men live on cultural residues?

[Right Wing Professor]

That the naturalists you know are too cowardly or thoughtless to follow their ideas to the necessary conclusion isn't my fault.

That's moronic, frankly. Nowhere does naturalism lead to the conclusion humans are 'random, meaningless aggregations of atoms'.