You must really like this graph. From my count you've posted 5 times in the last 4 days!
Pathetic.
You must really like this graph. From my count you've posted 5 times in the last 4 days!
Gee you must like it too, you just posted it the 6th time.
A picture is worth a 1000 words.
Here's a seventh:
This chart does not look very promising for the future
financial well-being of our offspring, does it?
TAXES
100years of history under the income tax makes it clear that we will not get there (smaller government) from here (the income tax).
"A hand from Washington will be stretched out and placed upon every man's business; the eye of the federal inspector will be in every man's counting house....The law will of necessity have inquisical features, it will provide penalties, it will create complicated machinery. Under it men will be hauled into courts distant from their homes. Heavy fines imposed by distant and unfamiliar tribunals will constantly menace the tax payer. An army of federal inspectors, spies, and detectives will descend upon the state."
-- Virginian House Speaker Richard E. Byrd, 1910, predicting the consequences of an income tax.
And, so, repeated postings makes it unreliable? Maybe lurkers and posters like to see it. DO YOU have a graph that counters the truth in it? Nah. You counter AG's graphs with such monumental facts as: "You are the stupidist man I know." Now that is a good argument YN. Of course you could post a graph that shows the absolute opposite of AG's graph. Hey, that's a good idea. We wait. Uh, we wait, uh, we wait. Did you say you have a graph? No you didn't. But you did imply that AG's graph was somehow...bogus. Please describe your opinion and supply your own graph. We wait with bated breath.