Posted on 05/27/2005 12:46:42 PM PDT by Asphalt
LOS ANGELES (AP) - The former national finance director for Hillary Rodham Clinton's Senate campaign was acquitted Friday of lying to the government about a lavish 2000 Hollywood fundraising gala.
David Rosen was charged with two counts of making false statements to the Federal Election Commission about the cost of the star-studded gala, which attracted such celebrities as Cher, Melissa Ethridge, Toni Braxton, Diana Ross, Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston.
The jury deliberated about six hours before reaching its verdict.
"It was hard for me to hold back tears. My whole family is crying, and my attorney is crying. It was the happiest moment, next to my marriage, in my life," Rosen said.
Clinton was not charged, but Republicans closely monitored the trial, hoping fallout from it might damage the New York Democrat's 2006 re-election bid and scuttle any hopes for a possible presidential campaign in 2008.
Prosecutors said Rosen, 38, panicked over the mounting costs for the fundraiser and lied to conceal its true cost from both the Clinton campaign and the government. They said Clinton was unaware of any wrongdoing.
Prosecutors said he filed a federal campaign finance report to claim "in-kind" contributions of about $400,000, when he knew that actual contributions for the event exceeded $1.1 million.
It is not illegal for campaigns to accept in-kind contributions, such as the use of cars, hotel rooms, and sound systems, but election law requires such items be reported so the public knows who is helping a candidate.
Prosecutors say Rosen was trying to duck federal financing rules so Clinton's campaign would have more money to spend on her 2000 Senate race against Rick Lazio.
The fundraiser took place at a tony, 112-acre private estate, and Assistant U.S. Attorney Peter Zeidenberg told jurors it cost $90,000 just to get the celebrities and their entourages there. Zeidenberg said organizers spent $35,000 more to provide attendees with souvenir director's chairs from the event and another $50,000 to produce CDs that were included in the gift bags.
Rosen testified that he mistakenly thought some in-kind contributions, including the Porsche he used while in Los Angeles to organize the event, were simply gifts.
"If I executed poor judgment in that decision, I made a mistake, but I certainly didn't intend to hide anything," he testified.
Rosen also said he was mainly involved in raising money for the event and left the actual organizing to others.
The event, which netted just $91,000, was bankrolled by Peter F. Paul, a three-time convicted felon who pleaded guilty in March to separate securities fraud charges.
BTTT
Wasn't this the guy that they had on tape admitting his wrong doing??? Or do I have the wrong case.
Not sure
Dang! That clintoon teflon is still in place.
hehe, some things never change
What's next?
Prosecutors decided against using the tape.
A conviction would have been received by the MSM with stoney silence. Watch them run with this.
With this type of law, admissions are kind of tricky. Saying 'I misclassified an expense in the wrong account' is different from saying 'I intentionally misclassified an expense in the wrong account, fully understanding the provisions of article 6 in section 7 of subchapter 45'.
They have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the violation was intentional.
Hollywood has strong ties to the mob.
Can anyone say FBI files? Fort Marcy Park? Arkancide?
This guy has admitted wrongdoing, yet was aquitted? Let me guess - a jury full of Clinton friends??? How ignorant can a jury be? Maybe it's the same jury from the OJ trail?
No justice. The campaign finance laws are being selectively enforced.
I suspect that the reason he was acquitted is that the liberal California jury did not want to cause a result that was embarrassing to Ms. Clinton.
Well, when you put a Clintonite in a california courtroom...thats comparable to putting bin laden on trial for 9/11 in a Saudi court.
Another idiot jury heard from.
They had this guy dead bang guilty. The "prosecution" decided to throw the case. It's prosecutorial malfeasance.
yep
Enough said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.