Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tarpon
Imagine how effective border watch would be if we mounted air conditioned fire towers, equipped with high power infrared binoculars in each, radios, beds, kitchen supplies, and yes even machine guns -- put them up every few miles with air support at nearby airbases.

Actually, that's close to what we have in some areas, down in Tucson Sector near Douglas, AZ for example. Right on the border line there are regularly-spaced towers with thermal, low-light, and visible-light scopes. They're remotely monitored, so people don't have to be present in them. One problem they've had is that some are in pretty remote areas, so they've had incidents in which people climb up there and bash the hell out of the equipment. Maybe remotely-operated machine guns for tower defense would be a good idea.

12 posted on 05/27/2005 8:42:17 AM PDT by John Jorsett (scam never sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: John Jorsett
Maybe remotely-operated machine guns for tower defense would be a good idea.

Nope, bad idea, and totally unnecessary. All you have to do is keep the towers at full height until sensors indicate movement on the support structure as somone tries to climb the tower.

Just before the 'someone' reaches the platform that the sensors are resting on, the hydraulics fail and the whole tower collapses. You know how shoddy defense contractors' work is supposed to be, right?

Same result, no liability.

48 posted on 06/23/2005 2:06:58 PM PDT by HiJinx (Remember, you have to seal the dike before you can drain the swamp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson