Yes, you are correct. Bush, the WH, Frist, the senate leadership were all in on "the deal." Unfortunately, I think the sting is on the voters, not the Democrats. There isn't going to be any nuclear option and there isn't going to be any SC appointee unless Bush finds himself a "Souter." My guess is they will try to convince us we need to go to the polls in even bigger numbers next time and elect more Republicans so they can be chairmen and we can get the shaft (again.)
Thanks for that information, as I missed the very first of the report. I have heard the last few days that some were surprised that Graham and DeWine came in late on the compromise talks, so it made sense to me that it could have been the WH that sent them in late to make sure the CO was retained if a compromise was reached.
I think there is probably a lot behind the scenes we don't know about, but I do think this can still play out to our benefit if the compromise can give cover to a couple of the RINO's to vote for the CO - I still have hope as since the Dems will break the compromise, then that can be a reason a couple of the RINO's might back the CO and we can get rid of the filibuster - then Bush can get his nominees through.
I share your frustration, but this poker hand hasn't been played out yet, and I am still holding out hope - and judgement - until it does.