To: aQ_code_initiate
Well put. There is no doubt in my mind the immature 18-year-old was taking a direct shot at the principal. The sad thing is that most posters here know that as well and won't admit it because they abhor authority and or public schools as much as this ignorant 18-year old junior does.
68 posted on
05/26/2005 11:40:46 AM PDT by
L98Fiero
To: L98Fiero
Public schools, of course, have their problems, but this issue is a simple matter of discipline. Before the 1960s, no one would have sided with the girl.
To: L98Fiero
Well put. There is no doubt in my mind the immature 18-year-old was taking a direct shot at the principal. The sad thing is that most posters here know that as well and won't admit it because they abhor authority and or public schools as much as this ignorant 18-year old junior does.
There's nothing wrong with defying authority when that authority is genuinely corrupt. In this case, the student was objecting to the immorality of having a criminal drunkard overseeing the education of several hundred children. I happen to agree with her position, and if the teachers unions and corrupt school boards managed to undermine basic morality and keep this dipsh*t in his job, then I'd say that a little civil disobedience is in order.
Our country wouldn't exist today if it weren't for citizens revolting against the tyrants and corrupt leaders imposed upon them.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson