Replies

Children are in school to learn citizenship as much as math, and good citizenship means objecting to inept leadership.

Children by definition do not have the capacity to "object to inept leadership". You want children to be defining "inept leadership"?

As for him paying his debt to society, I suppose you'd also advocate letting released child molestors run daycare centers or convicted murderers teach.

Sure. Nice try, DUmmie.

As a general rule, I object to ANY criminal in ANY leadership position in the public schools, and this entire situation clearly demonstrates the wisdom of that position.

"You" and "wisdom" have parted company a long, long, long, time ago.

You want children to be defining "inept leadership"?

I would hope that, by her junior year of HS and 18 years of age, she would know the difference between skilled and inept leadership. Heck, I knew the difference a LOT earlier than that.

As to the rest of what you wrote, I'm not even going to dignify that with a reply. If you can't see the wisdom in maintaining certain moral and ethical standards for those who oversee our children, then there's no point in arguing with you.