[beezdotcom]

Actually you are very wrong. If you caused the collision, you caused the collision, regardless if you feel you were negligent or not. The party that sustains damages or injuries is not going to care what the reason was for running into them.

Re-read. Catch up. There's a big difference between "being liable" and being "criminally negligent". It's the "criminal negligence" part of the arguments that I'm not buying - you know, the part that can result in jail time.

[Black Tooth]

Actually you are very wrong. If you caused the collision, you caused the collision, regardless if you feel you were negligent or not. The party that sustains damages or injuries is not going to care what the reason was for running into them.

Re-read. Catch up. There's a big difference between "being liable" and being "criminally negligent".

My quote said nothing about criminally negligent. You will be found *liable* if it's found you caused a collision. In some circumstances you may be found criminally negligent, but in most cases it's all about liability.