[Lonesome in Massachussets]

Cry me a river. If she did the crime, the punishment fits.

I think you missed the point, it was the victims' family that was concerned that the jury might let her skate with a life sentence. BTW, Pam Smart wants to be paroled and still maintains she was guilty of adultery but not involved in her husband's murder. She's a walking advert for the death penalty, some day some nitwit judge or politician is going commute her sentence.

[b4its2late]

Don't take offense, but it doesn't matter to me who was crying for whom really. She needs to be punished if she did what she has been charged with. I think the crying comments in the article are there to make the reader feel for this criminal. That's where I'm coming from.

Maybe I'm being extremely thick, but who is Pam Smart?