To: tuffydoodle
I don't see the problem people are having with this, and quite frankly, I don't give a rat's behind about the person's age or gender. Conspiring to kill and following through with it should be an instant death sentence.
We have enough evil in this world. Just because this murderer is a young woman and the bleeding hearts WANT to believe otherwise, she should not be given any leniency. She is a murderer and deserves to be given the same justice she gave her victim.
29 posted on
05/26/2005 7:29:05 AM PDT by
SaveTheChief
(<insert clever, witty, or silly statement here>)
To: SaveTheChief
"I don't see the problem people are having with this, and quite frankly, I don't give a rat's behind about the person's age or gender. Conspiring to kill and following through with it should be an instant death sentence. "
I don't think people have a problem with it in general. The judge was probably surprised (although I'm curious as to what "appeared surprised means" I doubt he jumped up on the bench and said "Holy Sh*T you're executing her!" and then slapped himself in the forehead and fainted) As the stat pointed out for whatever reason, a lot of women don't get the Ax. I would imagine that bias usually comes from the jury. I'm kind of surprised she got death. She's no model, but she does have a "baby face" so i would have thought she would have gotten more sympathy. Lets face it, it's easier to send an ugly girl to the chair then to send Cindy Crawford. Or maybe that's just me :)
35 posted on
05/26/2005 7:34:30 AM PDT by
tfecw
(Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
To: SaveTheChief
***I don't see the problem people are having with this***
"People" are not having a problem with this. The msm & activist courts are. And we know they are not "people" - just part of the liberal - oops meant progressive movement.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson