With that.....there is no need to read the rest of your article.
Worse? Well, it depends on what the word "is" is, or what the word "worse" is.
I don't buy that Bush is "worse" than Clinton, but the FACT remains Bush is a worse fiscal trasher than Clinton. Clinton did not come anywhere near Bush in fiscal waste. Bush has pushed the envelope of fiscal lunacy on social welfare spendig into the ionosphere.
Clinton did not guard the borders any better than Bush, but don't we expect a Republican to protect our sovereignty? Bush thus becomes "worse" in the eyes of many true conservatives because he should be held to a higher standard.
To say Bush is a disappointment fiscally and on national sovereignty is a galactic sized understatement.
Oh nooo Jimmy Carter has that honor.