Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Melas
Well, I think there should be an age limit above which there *shouldn't* be cuts, but age 50 is too low. I'd set it somewhere between 60 and 65. People in their 50's, and even 60's, are still healthy enough to work at least part time.

Folks below that age limit cannot expect their SS checks to be the amount "promised" them years before.

149 posted on 05/25/2005 3:00:51 PM PDT by k2blader ("A kingdom of conscience ... That is what lies at the end of Crusade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]


To: k2blader

We agree in spirit, but we're far apart on details. I question if 40 is too low, and you're convinced that 50 is 50 is too low. I'm positive 50 is too late to start planning an alternate form of retirement. Even 40, for many represents more than 20 years of paying in to the syste, and IMHO, may be too late to change ships for many people that age.


166 posted on 05/25/2005 7:31:07 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson