To: Goodgirlinred
Jail would require taking a cell away from someone who really needs to be in a cell.
85 posted on
05/25/2005 8:49:51 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
To: xzins
Yep. Putting her in jail would serve no purpose at all. As a matter of fact, I am against putting people in jail for nonviolent crimes. I feel that they can best punished by making them pay for their crimes in other ways. Martha Stewart could have worked for Habit for Humanity for one thing. Or, she could have worked in a soup kitchen. She could have used her talents for good for the time of her jail sentence instead of using taxpayers' money to house her in prison. White collar criminals could serve sentences on the outside in much better ways and save taxpayers' money and help society as well.
107 posted on
05/25/2005 9:07:43 AM PDT by
Goodgirlinred
( GoodGirlInRed Four More Years!!!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson