[Alkhin]

And the source refutes what? in the article? World Net Daily is a credible source...unlike the history books the racist Aztlan people hand around.

I am quite confident in the sources *I* choose to read.

[raivyn]

Are you kidding me?

"The source" (in this case source=worldnet daily) was positive... especially compared to the MSM... What part of "the source was positive" (i.e. GOOD) do you not understand?

[raivyn]

Let me spell this out for the both of you.

Well, at first I was shocked at the labels used in this article. [I was shocked because the labels being used where accurate.]

Then I noticed the source. [WorldNet Daily is no liberal mag-pie, so that explains why the labels were accurate.]

If this had been from the MSM all the euphemisms and dysphemisms would have been reversed... [i.e. People wanting to enforce the border would have been labeled as bad people, and the anti-American group would have been praised in the name of diversity and tolerance (as per the usual MSM modus operandi).]

I hope this explains any misunderstanding anyone has regarding my post.