Skip to comments.
Anti-illegals activists threatened
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44429 ^
| May 25, 2005
| Ron Strom
Posted on 05/25/2005 8:17:41 AM PDT by Boston Blackie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: Boston Blackie
2
posted on
05/25/2005 8:19:20 AM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: Boston Blackie
There's some great logic there Pedro. Do something that will make us want you out of here more than we already do.
3
posted on
05/25/2005 8:22:52 AM PDT
by
moehoward
To: Boston Blackie
Do run run run the do run run. Clear the way to all bathrooms "Montezuma's Revenge" has been called forth.
4
posted on
05/25/2005 8:23:12 AM PDT
by
handy old one
(It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims. Aristotle)
To: Boston Blackie
To: Boston Blackie
Well, at first I was shocked at the labels used in this article. Then I noticed the source. If this had been from the MSM all the euphemisms and dysphemisms would have been reversed...
6
posted on
05/25/2005 8:28:33 AM PDT
by
raivyn
(ATTENTION: My /sarcasm is broken - please don't take ANYTHING I say personally!)
To: Boston Blackie
Threat of domestic terrorism ??
7
posted on
05/25/2005 8:29:02 AM PDT
by
xcamel
(Deep Red, stuck in a "bleu" state.)
To: Boston Blackie
As an index of the level of the intelligence of this group read this earlier story. I suspect they also believe they are descended from the refugees from Atlantis:
'WE GOT HIM!'
Aztlan backers see
Hussein capture hoax
Mexican-American separatists
don't believe U.S. has Saddam
Posted: December 18, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com
A Mexican-American separatist website, La Voz de Aztlan, is claiming the U.S. capture of Saddam Hussein is a hoax.
The pro-Arab and viciously anti-Israeli organization also sees a spontaneous uprising of popular support for Hussein throughout Iraq a phenomenon unnoticed by news organizations throughout the world, including those in Arab countries.
According to the site, "extreme doubts have arisen throughout Islam that the released pictures by U.S. occupation forces of the 'captured Saddam' are of the Iraqi leader. Thousands of Iraqis, who knew Saddam, are claiming that it is one of Saddam's many known 'doubles.'"
Why would an American-based website produced by Mexican-Americans be so committed to the legacy of Saddam Hussein?
The Aztlan movement, which calls for the creation of a separate, Spanish-speaking state in North America out of much of the Southwest, gets its inspiration from Yasser Arafat's Palestinian statehood movement.
La Voz de Aztlan, or the Voice of Aztlan, called the capture of Hussein the "mother of all hoaxes."
Its website identifies Mexicans in the U.S. as "America's Palestinians." Many Mexicans see themselves as part of a transnational ethnic group known as "La Raza" the race. A May editorial on the website, with a dateline of "Los Angeles, Alta California," declares that "both La Raza and the Palestinians have been displaced by invaders that have utilized military means to conquer and occupy our territories."
Hussein, the group's captive hero, meanwhile, paid some $35 million in aid to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers.
According to a survey conducted in June 2002, a healthy majority of Mexicans claim that their country rightfully owns much of the southwestern United States, while most Americans believe Washington should adopt stricter immigration standards and deploy U.S. troops along the border. The Zogby International poll found a majority of Mexicans say the U.S. Southwest "rightfully belongs to Mexico," and that Mexican citizens should be able to come into those areas freely, without U.S. permission. The poll found that 58 percent of Mexicans agree with the statement, "The territory of the United States' Southwest rightfully belongs to Mexico." Zogby said 28 percent disagreed, while another 14 percent said they weren't sure.
Activists who quite literally see themselves as "America's Palestinians" are gearing up a movement to carve out of the southwestern United States a region including all of Bush's home state of Texas a sovereign Hispanic state called the Republica del Norte.
"There are great similarities between the political and economic condition of the Palestinians in occupied Palestine and that of La Raza in the southwest United States," explains an editorial in La Voz de Aztlan in Los Angeles, the city seen as the future capital of the new Hispanic state much like Jerusalem is seen by Palestinian Arabs as their capital.
The editorial goes on to draw analogies between the Arab uprising in Israel and gang violence in Los Angeles. It's the same thing, the activists claim. This is not crime and punishment, according to La Raza activists, this is the birth of an independence movement by young Hispanics.
"The similarities are many," says the editorial. "The takeover of our respective lands by foreign elements occurred 100 years apart. For La Raza, it happened in 1848 when Mexico lost the southwest at the end of the Mexican-American War and the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo. For the Palestinians, it occurred in 1948 when the Zionist Jewish People's Council gathered at the Tel Aviv Museum and signed the 'Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel' on the day in which the British Mandate over Palestine expired."
To: Boston Blackie
"If we were to let these people frighten us, we wouldn't be very good Americans, would we?" Saye asked. "We've all been fighters throughout the generations, for our freedoms and our liberties, so we're going to stand our ground."
Only thing I would like to add to this is... We need to stop standing our ground and go on the Offensive. Nobody ever won a defensive war. EVER!
9
posted on
05/25/2005 8:32:56 AM PDT
by
Leatherneck_MT
(3-7-77 (No that's not a Date))
To: raivyn
Well, at first I was shocked at the labels used in this article. Then I noticed the source. If this had been from the MSM all the euphemisms and dysphemisms would have been reversed...If you don't believe this is real, then you need to go back to your cocoon.
They are a real threat to America's sovereignty. They want to take back the entire South West of the US.
10
posted on
05/25/2005 8:40:47 AM PDT
by
processing please hold
(Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
To: pbrown
I'm sorry that you are too feeble minded to actually comprehend what my post said...
11
posted on
05/25/2005 8:49:30 AM PDT
by
raivyn
(ATTENTION: My /sarcasm is broken - please don't take ANYTHING I say personally!)
To: raivyn
Then I noticed the source.If that isn't a slam, then I don't know what is.
And you know what you can do with your insult...
12
posted on
05/25/2005 8:55:54 AM PDT
by
processing please hold
(Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
To: robowombat; All
Didn't Pat Buchanan in his book "A Republic, Not An Empire", state that we really purchased (not took by armed force)much of the Southwest from Mexico, and that the Mexican government was even willing to sell us Baja California?
13
posted on
05/25/2005 9:04:04 AM PDT
by
Jacob Kell
(Regan 3:16: He whooped Communism's ass!)
To: pbrown
Actually "the source" in this case was positive. Especially when compared with the MSM.
Now, I know you're a smart guy... So, what do you imagine the article would look like if the euphemisms were replaced with dysphemisms? And vice versa? Hmm?
That's right a piece of MSM trash, slamming border enforcement and praising those poor misunderstood immigrants.
You see when I read the snippit of the article posted I thought it was an awfully right headed story on immigration - then I noticed THE SOURCE of the article. That explains why the article was right thinking.
Do I need to break this down for you further?
So you know what you can do with your attack now don't you?
That's right you can stick it back "in your hole".
14
posted on
05/25/2005 9:06:49 AM PDT
by
raivyn
(ATTENTION: My /sarcasm is broken - please don't take ANYTHING I say personally!)
To: pbrown
Pardon me, "back in your cocoon".
15
posted on
05/25/2005 9:08:26 AM PDT
by
raivyn
(ATTENTION: My /sarcasm is broken - please don't take ANYTHING I say personally!)
To: raivyn
And the source refutes
what? in the article? World Net Daily is a credible source...unlike the history books the racist Aztlan people hand around.
I am quite confident in the sources *I* choose to read.
16
posted on
05/25/2005 9:11:21 AM PDT
by
Alkhin
("Oh! Oh!" cried my idiot crew. "It's a ghoul - we are lost!" ~ Jack Aubrey)
To: Alkhin
Are you kidding me?
"The source" (in this case source=worldnet daily) was positive... especially compared to the MSM... What part of "the source was positive" (i.e. GOOD) do you not understand?
17
posted on
05/25/2005 9:16:48 AM PDT
by
raivyn
(ATTENTION: My /sarcasm is broken - please don't take ANYTHING I say personally!)
To: raivyn
Whats the disagreement then?
18
posted on
05/25/2005 9:20:31 AM PDT
by
Alkhin
("Oh! Oh!" cried my idiot crew. "It's a ghoul - we are lost!" ~ Jack Aubrey)
To: Boston Blackie
"a separate Hispanic nation in the southwest U.S. " I thought there was one called Mexico?
To: Boston Blackie
With the CRIMINAL INVADERS not being checked for diseases, they may not have to do anything overtly to cause sickness.
20
posted on
05/25/2005 9:23:07 AM PDT
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
("In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit." AYN RAND)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson