[jwalsh07]

An irrational man can read Dawkins views on religion and come away thinking Dawkins would not ban religion if he were King. A rational man would not I think.

Is it a requirement that I now call you a liar because we disagree on this? I don't see how that gets us anywhere but if it's in the rules I'll do it.

[edsheppa]

Unless you can show an in context Dawkins quote where he advocates banning (dictionary meaning: an official prohibition or edict) religion or show in some other way that he has advocated it, then you are just another Creationist liar.