[TomB]

That is exactly my point.

That science changes according to evidence? I think not.

Evolution has been studied for a century and the evidence only grows stronger.

If the evidence for evolution is as weak as implied, why aren't more scientists changing their minds, as they did with the "flat earth"?

[armymarinedad]

I was not implying the evidence for evolutionism was weak. In fact it is very strong. I was not saying that science doesn't change, I know it does. However at the time it was believed the evidence was considered strong that the earth was flat. Science had to change however when man learned different. If scientist much more knowledgeable than me were so certain of evolution it would be scientific law not scientific theory.