Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: donh
So many???? Out of what total, do you suppose?

I don't care about the "total." The FACT is, there are quite a few scientists that hold Ph.D's (not pseudo scientists or Talkorg. regurgitators) who are anti-darwinists. Why do you think that is?

310 posted on 05/25/2005 12:38:54 PM PDT by Michael_Michaelangelo (The best theory is not ipso facto a good theory. Lots of links on my homepage...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]


To: Michael_Michaelangelo
So many???? Out of what total, do you suppose?

I don't care about the "total."

Of course you don't, because than you'd have to wrestle with the absurdity of this argument--you don't care to uncover this question because you know perfectly well that virtually all biologists are pursuaded by evolutionary theory. There is no vast controversy within the scientific community about the reliability of the theory of evolution, no matter how much confident-looking preening and strutting you do. That is a plain and obvious fact anyone can check out for themselves by going to any reputable university natural history department or biology department, and taking a poll of the scientists you find lurking there.

337 posted on 05/25/2005 1:22:13 PM PDT by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson