I don't care about the "total." The FACT is, there are quite a few scientists that hold Ph.D's (not pseudo scientists or Talkorg. regurgitators) who are anti-darwinists. Why do you think that is?
I don't care about the "total."
Of course you don't, because than you'd have to wrestle with the absurdity of this argument--you don't care to uncover this question because you know perfectly well that virtually all biologists are pursuaded by evolutionary theory. There is no vast controversy within the scientific community about the reliability of the theory of evolution, no matter how much confident-looking preening and strutting you do. That is a plain and obvious fact anyone can check out for themselves by going to any reputable university natural history department or biology department, and taking a poll of the scientists you find lurking there.