Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
I kept your "may be explained" and only added the word "best".

I understand. And I resist the use of "best," based on Occam's Razor. It seems to me -- in my always humble opinion -- that if you have two possible explanations for a phenomenon, one being natural and undirected, and the other being (forgive me) an unseen intervention by little green men from Uranus, then without any further evidence to support the Uranus explanation, I don't think it can be seriously considered.

The biggest difference between us that where you have "biological features or processes that are otherwise inexplicable" I prefer "features of life v non-life" so as to not unintentionally limit the discussion to bio/chemistry alone.

Well, yeah. But that really opens it up. In these threads, we're usually discussing the adequacy of the biological theory of evolution.

1,698 posted on 05/28/2005 3:04:00 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1696 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry
Prime.

Dawg.

1,700 posted on 05/28/2005 3:08:58 PM PDT by Hoplite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1698 | View Replies ]

Intelligently designed placemarker


1,702 posted on 05/28/2005 3:12:25 PM PDT by anguish (while science catches up.... mysticism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1698 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
It seems to me -- in my always humble opinion -- that if you have two possible explanations for a phenomenon, one being natural and undirected, and the other being (forgive me) an unseen intervention by little green men from Uranus, then without any further evidence to support the Uranus explanation, I don't think it can be seriously considered.

But if you swear your next door neighbors, who may have seen such a visit, to silence, don't be surprised how it plays out.

1,703 posted on 05/28/2005 3:13:30 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1698 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry; AntiGuv; betty boop; xzins; AndrewC; HiTech RedNeck
Thank you for your reply! I must make this quick - I have to cook and such.

Well, yeah. But that really opens it up.

Exactly. That is the point. Looking at the intelligent design hypothesis only from the bio/chemical viewpoint is to prejudice the conclusion - which leads me to your first point on your reply:

I understand. And I resist the use of "best," based on Occam's Razor.

The quality of "best" ought to be determined on ideologically and theologically neutral ground.

IMHO, all of science ought to be ideologically and theologically neutral - not prejudiced toward any metaphysical worldview.

1,709 posted on 05/28/2005 3:30:56 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1698 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Festival of Uranus placemarker


1,739 posted on 05/28/2005 8:32:27 PM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1698 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson