Funny, you didn't seem to have any problem reaching into your butt to pull out a caricature of conservatives? Frankly, your analysis reads like a very articulate adolecent telling me everything they know about Tuck-son, Arizona.
First off, the word is spelled "adolescent," which you'd discover if you used that nifty spell-check button.
Second off, it's easy to caricature SOME folks when they are ignorant enough. I'll repeat it again: Too many on the right think the reversal of Roe would end legalization of abortion in the U.S. They will be extremely disappointed and angry when they find this is untrue. And it is a larger number than you think. I can't reach into my butt and pull out numbers for you, cause I'm no pollster and I don't feel like doing that which I think would solidly demonstrate what I opine (i.e., ask the RTL ping list what they expect from the Bush appointees on the issue of abortion and see how many say 'overturning Roe, banning abortion.') but I'd love to see a REAL poll on the topic, and I strongly believe this to be true based on my experiences here--admittedly anecdotal. The left has done such a good job pushing the idea that Roe stands for legal abortion that far too many on the right think without Roe there is no legal abortion.
What you've demonstrated again is that your ability to ignore what I said is much better than your ability to address it, to the point that you must toss out insults and raise much more spurious claims like "No one on the right is asking for anything more than original intent judges."
I can demonstrate otherwise right here, in the words of Dan Holman, pro-life missionary and Westboro Church member:
"Scalia wants to overturn Roe for technicalities. He does not want to outlaw abortion, but return it to the authority of the states. He does not recognize the humanity of the babies."
Most of the Constitution Party feels the same way.
I have an opinion based, as I said, on anecdotal experience, which you have neither managed to refute nor dent with your insulting comments. I admit that it may not be supported by numbers that I can produce, but your sneering aside, at least I can point to some folks whose comments support what I said and disprove your bold negative assertion. "Too many" is one person, honestly, but I am sure the numbers who believe that abortion is going to be outlawed by overturning Roe is 10% of the pro-life movement or better. Saying it again doesn't prove my point that there are MANY folks who believe this, and these folks I've quoted don't bear out MY point, but these folks I've noted here certainly prove YOUR point wrong. All of them want judges to read a nationalization of pro-life positions on abortion into the Constitution. That is certainly not the original intent of the Founders, no matter how much we might like it to be.
So who's able to demonstrate more clearly that their opinions are valid? I certainly can't claim proof of my opinion, and I didn't. However, you are demonstrably flat wrong, and a rude little SOB to boot. ESAD.