Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fred Nerks
Thanks for posting that Fred. Though not all not all those scenarios are likely to play out, the list would serve well as a stark warning to some of the dangers we face, and remind folks of the ultimate price we may pay if we do not keep our focus and resolve in continuing the war against the global jihad.

The hug-a-terrrorist crowd just don't seem to get it... the stakes are high, but the "useful idiots" stop us from doing what needs to be done right now to prevent many of those very frightening scenarios from eventually playing out and in doing so they put many more innocent lives at risk.

As for the "triple alliance" concept, sometimes I wish we were working on it right this minute, maybe not simply as a "triple alliance," but some sort of larger anti-Jihad alliance along the lines of the old NATO, comprised of nations that are facing the Islamic threat such as the US, Israel, Britain, Australia, India, Russia, so we don't keep getting in each others way and focus our collective attention on the enemy. Call it an "anti-terror alliance" or any other unassuming name, as long as the understanding and ultimate goals are clear among those who matter.

86 posted on 05/25/2005 7:08:32 AM PDT by USF (I see your Jihad and raise you a Crusade ™ © ®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: USF; Alamo-Girl; jan in Colorado

91 posted on 05/25/2005 3:40:21 PM PDT by CHARLITE (Ward Churchill should pack his bags and go join a tribe in Darfur, SUDAN, with KOFI ANNAN........!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson