Skip to comments.
In Trial, Drug Aids Vision of Elderly
NY Times ^
| May 24, 2005
| ANDREW POLLACK
Posted on 05/24/2005 5:56:39 PM PDT by neverdem
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
1
posted on
05/24/2005 5:56:41 PM PDT
by
neverdem
To: El Gato; JudyB1938; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; ..
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.
2
posted on
05/24/2005 6:08:44 PM PDT
by
neverdem
(May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
To: neverdem
This is awesome. I have macular digeneration. My mother was blind with it by the time she died and our opthamologist tells my 28 year old son that she sees the beginning of it in his eyes.
3
posted on
05/24/2005 6:17:56 PM PDT
by
Mercat
To: neverdem
Viagra helps my vision /sarc
I have bad vision myself, i'm glad they find something to help the elderly, if it doesn't have side effects!
4
posted on
05/24/2005 6:30:15 PM PDT
by
1FASTGLOCK45
(FreeRepublic: More fun than watching Dem'Rats drown like Turkeys in the rain! ! !)
To: 1FASTGLOCK45
Once this med lets the Viagra crowd get a clear view of what they're about to get, sales of the little blue pills may plummet.
5
posted on
05/24/2005 6:33:11 PM PDT
by
edpc
To: edpc
I called in sick today........ told the boss I had anal glaucoma. He asked what that was and I told him I just couldn't see my a$$ coming in today.
6
posted on
05/24/2005 7:02:49 PM PDT
by
umgud
(FR, NASCAR, NRA, GOP)
To: neverdem
I wonder if this research is the result of fetal stem cells...
7
posted on
05/24/2005 7:07:43 PM PDT
by
eleni121
('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
To: eleni121
If thy eye offends thee, pluck it out?
8
posted on
05/24/2005 7:24:08 PM PDT
by
null and void
(The befaster I run, the behinder I get...)
To: neverdem
Hmmmm, My dad is scheduled to start Macugen Friday ($4,000/treatment, a treatment every 6 weeks).
He's VERY interested in this new stuff.
9
posted on
05/24/2005 7:29:24 PM PDT
by
null and void
(The befaster I run, the behinder I get...)
To: eleni121
I wonder if this research is the result of fetal stem cells...Other than as a result of the development of fetal cells into the researchers themselves -- in a very natural process that all of us have undergone -- it is not.
To: Mercat
I too have ARMD wet form and have lost central vision in left eye and right eye is showing signs of going bad. I heard that they have been working on this for some time and thrilled this has finally been announced.
May all that dream of one day finding a way to at least stop the progression or perhaps the miracle of restoring some sight find hope in this new drug............
To: neverdem
good find, thanks for the ping!!
12
posted on
05/24/2005 7:58:48 PM PDT
by
bitt
("There are troubling signs Bush doesn't care about winning a third term." (JH2))
To: aposiopetic
I wouldn't be so sure...Genentech is fully involved in the despicable exploitation of fetal stem cells. Very disheartening if this is true.
13
posted on
05/24/2005 8:11:44 PM PDT
by
eleni121
('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
To: null and void
What a strange way to respond.
14
posted on
05/24/2005 8:12:08 PM PDT
by
eleni121
('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
To: eleni121
I work in this industry and am vocal in my opposition to the use of embryonic stem cells for research purposes. I can assure you that the time-lag between (a) research and (b) product development is long enough that the treatment now in clinical trial is not the result of research on embryonic stem cells, Genentech's (admittedly questionable) moral compass notwithstanding.
To: eleni121
Your choice. Lose your vision, or use something that *might* have been developed using something you don't approve of.
I'm reminded of the cognitive dissonance that a PETA member must have when they fall ill. Die, or use a drug tested on animals!
16
posted on
05/24/2005 9:05:37 PM PDT
by
null and void
(The befaster I run, the behinder I get...)
To: null and void
NO need to abuse the most helpless of humans in order to fix anything.
Morbid and highly disturbing.
17
posted on
05/24/2005 9:35:06 PM PDT
by
eleni121
('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
To: null and void
Exactly!! Don't you feel that a card-carrying member of PETA should be prohibited from receivng any type of medical intervention promoted by animal research?
18
posted on
05/24/2005 9:49:05 PM PDT
by
Fam4Bush
(NO ONE BUYS......NEWSWEEK DIES)
To: null and void
OTOH - A baby is a baby; no comparison to animal research.
Adult stem cells are the ones showing the most promise in many areas right now, but the researchers are having a difficult time getting funding. Reason: Political necessity to promote embryonic stem cell research per adherence to the death culture agenda.
19
posted on
05/24/2005 9:53:54 PM PDT
by
Fam4Bush
(NO ONE BUYS......NEWSWEEK DIES)
To: eleni121
So, if the only cure for your particular disease was somehow derived, no matter how peripherally, from embryonic stem cells, you would rather die than use it?
Dying's easy. Would you live for decades in intractable pain?
Would you languish unable to do more than blink your eyes?
20
posted on
05/24/2005 10:02:01 PM PDT
by
null and void
(The befaster I run, the behinder I get...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson