To: jwalsh07
I'm still not convinced that this wasn't a legislative defeat for the RATS. Without this deal, the vote on cloture today probably would have been no different from previous attempts.
We're all wringing our hands, pointing fingers, withholding donations to the RNC, yet the judicial confirmations are starting to proceed.
We'll just have to see if the Democrats will raise the "extreme circumstances" argument. They might not.
18 posted on
05/24/2005 3:19:30 PM PDT by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
23 posted on
05/24/2005 3:32:12 PM PDT by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
To: Dog Gone
I'm still not convinced that this wasn't a legislative defeat for the RATS. Without this deal, the vote on cloture today probably would have been no different from previous attempts. Without this deal, we could have exercised the constitutional option and not had this problem in the future for all judicial nominees. Then cloture would be 51 votes and not the current 60.
28 posted on
05/24/2005 3:47:04 PM PDT by
kabar
To: Dog Gone
We'll just have to see if the Democrats will raise the "extreme circumstances" argument. They might not.Wanna bet?
44 posted on
05/24/2005 4:17:34 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: Dog Gone
I'm still not convinced that this wasn't a legislative defeat for the RATS. Without this deal, the vote on cloture today probably would have been no different from previous attempts.
We're all wringing our hands, pointing fingers, withholding donations to the RNC, yet the judicial confirmations are starting to proceed.
We'd better hurry to cut off our noses to spite our faces before good things happen.
66 posted on
05/24/2005 7:31:46 PM PDT by
mtntop3
("He who must know before he believes will never come to full knowledge.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson