Right and Wrong...
this is getting nowhere.
what evidence, within human capacity to provide, would suffice to earn your admission to having made a factually erroneous all-or-nothing statement as the basis for one of your varied arguments?
more to the point: "believing in absolutes is not "all or nothing"
incorrect. It is binary morality. Zeros and Ones. or, as you put it: Right and Wrong, Truth or Lies.
That's strict binary. That's the very essence of all or nothing.
Nothing intrinsically wrong with it... unless it is factually erroneous (eg: neglects to notice the very real existence of values between 0 and 1)... which your noises concerning abstainance vs. addiction (ignoring moderation)certainly does.