Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Text of Filibuster Deal
Received via e-mail | Monday, May 23, 2005 | Rats and Rinos

Posted on 05/23/2005 5:23:07 PM PDT by kristinn

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS

 

We respect the diligent, conscientious efforts, to date, rendered to the Senate by Majority Leader Frist and Democratic Leader Reid. This memorandum confirms an understanding among the signatories, based upon mutual trust and confidence, related to pending and future judicial nominations in the 109th Congress.

 

This memorandum is in two parts. Part I relates to the currently pending judicial nominees; Part II relates to subsequent individual nominations to be made by the President and to be acted upon by the Senate’s Judiciary Committee.

 

We have agreed to the following:

 

Part I:  Commitments on Pending Judicial Nominations

 

A.        Votes for Certain Nominees. We will vote to invoke cloture on the following judicial nominees: Janice Rogers Brown (D.C. Circuit), William Pryor (11th Circuit), and Priscilla Owen (5th Circuit).

 

B.        Status of Other Nominees. Signatories make no commitment to vote for or against cloture on the following judicial nominees: William Myers (9th Circuit) and Henry Saad (6th Circuit).

 

Part II:  Commitments for Future Nominations

 

A.        Future Nominations. Signatories will exercise their responsibilities under the Advice and Consent Clause of the United States Constitution in good faith. Nominees should only be filibustered under extraordinary circumstances, and each signatory must use his or her own discretion and judgment in determining whether such circumstances exist.

 

B.        Rules Changes. In light of the spirit and continuing commitments made in this agreement, we commit to oppose the rules changes in the 109th Congress, which we understand to be any amendment to or interpretation of the Rules of the Senate that would force a vote on a judicial nomination by means other than unanimous consent or Rule XXII.

 

We believe that, under Article II, Section 2, of the United States Constitution, the word “Advice” speaks to consultation between the Senate and the President with regard to the use of the President’s power to make nominations. We encourage the Executive branch of government to consult with members of the Senate, both Democratic and Republican, prior to submitting a judicial nomination to the Senate for consideration.

 

Such a return to the early practices of our government may well serve to reduce the rancor that unfortunately accompanies the advice and consent process in the Senate.

 

We firmly believe this agreement is consistent with the traditions of the United States Senate that we as Senators seek to uphold.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; filibuster; judicialnominees; transcript; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 381-400 next last
To: madprof98
mccain wont get through the primaries.
he is now hated by the grass roots.

I dont care how many glowing wash post /nyt stories are written about him.
he is a traitor...a rino...and everyone knows it.
61 posted on 05/23/2005 5:45:08 PM PDT by Casaubon (Internet Research Ninja Masta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JAWs
What I find interesting is the Dems let through the ones sure to generate the most political heat on them (the women and Pryor).

Precisely. And, in return, the Democrats have won the right to filibuster all subsequent judicial nominees. Note that the GOP senators signed away the ability to effect a rules change for the balance of this Congress.

Net result: short-term win for the Democrats (dodging the Owens and Brown bullet)...and a long-term loss for the GOP.

Absolutely tragic. The President should be appalled.

62 posted on 05/23/2005 5:45:15 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: putupjob

I am as mad as a hornet about this too. I will not, however, through the baby (Republicans) out with the bath water (Warner,McCain, Snowe, Collins, Graham, Wimp from RI, and whoever the hell the 7th jerk is). We must work hard to retain and purge the party.


63 posted on 05/23/2005 5:45:38 PM PDT by conservaDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: July 4th
Exactly! At least change the rules so that if you filibuster, you actually have to be on the floor speaking. If you leave, even to go to the can, vote's on at that point. This "filibuster because I said so" is simply obstructionism with a prettier name.
64 posted on 05/23/2005 5:45:46 PM PDT by Jokelahoma (Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf

"Frist folds.
No way he gets my vote, for anything, ever."

Remember, Frist is not a signatory to this deal. Only those 14 Senators who signed this are bound to it. This really does not change much. This means these 14 will vote for cloture only IF and when the cloture vote is called. Other Senators can vote for ar against cloture.


65 posted on 05/23/2005 5:45:47 PM PDT by hophead ("Enjoy Every Sandwich")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SoCar
"Frist did not do this! What is wrong with you!"

Watch your mouth.

If you think Frist couldn't have trashcanned this and gone forward with the nuclear option, you know zero about the workings of the senate. Educate yourself before you start with the rudeness.

66 posted on 05/23/2005 5:45:50 PM PDT by Darkwolf (aka Darkwolf377 lurker since'01, member since 4/'04--stop clogging me with pings!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

This is nearly a complete and total sellout. These RINO's make me sick.


67 posted on 05/23/2005 5:46:03 PM PDT by Colorado Buckeye (It's the culture stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
LOL! I don't like this deal because frankly, I would have liked to see the Democrats taken down for a peg. But since its the Senate, there's not much you can do.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
68 posted on 05/23/2005 5:46:20 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Lyford

You can say this is not Frist's fault, yet it seems to me that Trent Lott could hold all of the Republicans and get six Democrats, too.


69 posted on 05/23/2005 5:46:25 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

Graham started folding some time ago, which I have to admit surprised me. Maybe it shouldn't have.


70 posted on 05/23/2005 5:46:35 PM PDT by Darkwolf (aka Darkwolf377 lurker since'01, member since 4/'04--stop clogging me with pings!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
Frist probably didn't have the votes...and he should have named every single republican who would not vote against the democrats. He should have declared them obstructionists and let the public deal with them.

Frist is ineffective and should be removed from any leadership position.

71 posted on 05/23/2005 5:46:39 PM PDT by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: etcb

Did you hear Frist from the floor? Sounded like a pretty happy man to me.


72 posted on 05/23/2005 5:47:10 PM PDT by Darkwolf (aka Darkwolf377 lurker since'01, member since 4/'04--stop clogging me with pings!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SoCar

Amen. I'm almost as angry with the Frist-bashers on FR as I am with the seven turncoat RINOs that stabbed us in the back. Talk about missing the whole point! Frist has been betrayed, as have we all. We need to stand with Frist and target the RINOs, to purge this party of the scum that would water it down to meaningless platitudes.


73 posted on 05/23/2005 5:47:32 PM PDT by Deo et Patria (Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

Nope. Listen to Frist's chat from the floor. Keep a barf bag handy, though.


74 posted on 05/23/2005 5:47:51 PM PDT by Darkwolf (aka Darkwolf377 lurker since'01, member since 4/'04--stop clogging me with pings!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: lormand

This is a bit different than what McCain announced.

This is worse than what was presented at the press conference.


75 posted on 05/23/2005 5:48:06 PM PDT by alnick (Rice 2005: We've only just begun to see what Freedom can achieve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Moral Hazard
Republican signatories up for reelection in 2006:
Michael DeWine, Oh Susan Colling, Me Lincoln Chafee, RI

DeWine has lost my vote in 2006.

76 posted on 05/23/2005 5:48:07 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (Not one damn dime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

This is a victory for Reid. A VICTORY.


77 posted on 05/23/2005 5:48:24 PM PDT by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: hophead
>>>Remember, Frist is not a signatory to this deal.

But he's responsible for why it happened.

If he had a molecule of testicular fortitude, the 'Rats would actually be doing a filibuster, and the 'Pubbies would not be cowering at the threat of one.
78 posted on 05/23/2005 5:48:43 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Life's a beach - and Liberals are like the sand that gets in your swimsuit...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Trueblackman

"The Majority Leader does not have to accept this."


But he will. Damned RINO!


79 posted on 05/23/2005 5:48:48 PM PDT by shellshocked (They're undocumented Border Patrol agents, not vigilantes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Deo et Patria

Frist did not have to accept this.


80 posted on 05/23/2005 5:49:18 PM PDT by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 381-400 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson