Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS
The idea is that there is not a commitment to the death by all opponents---only a few---and to allow the enemy a way out so that you do not force ALL to fight to the death, but to fritter away and splinter. Sun Tzu. Pretty smart guy.

But when there is commitment to death by enough of the other side, you must annihilate them. Their "sacrifice" (or martyrdom) will inspire still others. They must be hunted down and killed or otherwise neutralized *before* than can martyr themselves. In the case of the democrats, they may not really care that much about reelection of individuals, they can always find another schmuck to take the slot.

390 posted on 05/23/2005 8:45:21 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato
Sorry, that ain't what Sun Tzu says. One of the reasons for the "Bridge" is specifically so that you do NOT "annihilate" the enemy. (BTW, Tommy Franks quoted this exactly in his dicussion of the Gulf War, and agreed with it).

One reason you do not annihilate the enemy is that all enemy won't fight to the death, but will a) run, b) desert, c) come over to your side. You want a circumstance to allow the faint of heart to escape without sacrificing your own troops. It's pretty brilliant, and it was EXACTLY what we did in Fallujah when we had a "pause," where hundreds of "fighters" left the ranks and quit fighting; joined the Iraqi army; or just went back to their jobs. Then we killed the rest surgically, without a "Gotterdamerung."

408 posted on 05/24/2005 4:04:09 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson