Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons

I said from the very beginning that I am speculating, but my speculations were reasonable. First you stated that no way the President is involved in this without stating why. You have given no reason to indicate why my conjecture isn't plausible. Instead you call me names. I think you are a DUmmie in disguise, and not very good at that either. Go back to your cage and take your medication first.


2,107 posted on 05/23/2005 10:15:20 PM PDT by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2075 | View Replies ]


To: econ_grad
You didn't start of saying that your tripe was "speculation". That is a bold faced LIE!

You repeated your ridiculous and baseless scenario over and over and over again, a la Goebbels.

McCaine was NEVER working on the president's behalf and neither were the rest of his gang.

No president is ever complicit in working against himself and that's precisely what this "compromise" does.

There was NO reason at all and there still isn't one, for me to explain in detail, why your post is that of an uneducated, politically illiterate, mind blowingly juvenile naif. Simple common sense and the slightest acquaintace with political history would inform any reader of your posts to that.

And as far as my being a DUer and "off my meds", that is just your pathetic, childish way of refutation, because you are totally bereft of enough knowledge to prove med wrong.

A plausible conjecture has to be based on substantive facts; not your comic book delusions.

2,168 posted on 05/23/2005 11:11:11 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson