Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TXnMA

To call it sinful is a bit much.

There can be disagreement on the timetables due to how a person wants to interpret scripture. I myself see Gen as a 24 hour day or something like that. I dont think it reasonable to stretch the meaning of Peter all the way back to Gen. You may, I dont...its just a difference of opinion based on interpreting scripture. I certainly wouldnt consider it a sin.


394 posted on 05/23/2005 8:50:33 PM PDT by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies ]


To: wallcrawlr
The belief per se is not necessarily sinful.

I have been informed by the likes of the subect of this posted article that I am a Sinnah for "Not Be LeiveIng GoD's WooiooorD!!" simply because I disagree with their 24-hour creation-day interpretation.

Imposing that belief (with condemning judgement) on those who believe otherwise is, IMHO, sinful.

And building a $25 Million museum on such a flimsy and egocentric foundation is, IMO, the pinnacle of hubris.

401 posted on 05/23/2005 9:10:05 PM PDT by TXnMA (ATTN, ACLU & NAACP: There's no constitutionally protected right to NOT be offended -- Shove It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson