A theory is not disproven by pointing out occasional acts of academic misconduct, or even outright fraud. There are tens of thousands of scientists, and a few have disgraced themselves. (Similarly, a religion is not discredited because of the personal flaws of a few clergymen.) A demonstration of fraud could be a successful attack on a theory, but only if the theory can't survive without the fraudulent material.
Good stuff. I shoud have included that in my original reply, but, of course, didn't think if it. Thanks, I'll store it in a corner of my brain for the inevitable next time.
Well stated, for any academic discipline!
I don't think this thread has the legs for 7,000 posts, but it always is interesting. Sort of like the difference between a 4 week vacation, and a stop at a park for a picnic.
They're both good, but for different reasons.