To: ColoCdn
That's an odd, unfounded claim you've made, isn't it? Have you ever asked my opinion on whether I put up with Christian frauds?
You're right, I apologize for being so presumptious. It's just that I've seen so few creationists call other creationists to task on demonstratable lies that I've gotten into the habit of assuming -- because it tends to be a safe bet -- that a given creationist doesn't care when his or her colleagues lie.
So tell me, what do you think of known liars-for-creationism here on FR such as Matchett-PI and nmh?
137 posted on
05/23/2005 9:45:28 AM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
I wait with bated breath. Whatever that means.
140 posted on
05/23/2005 9:52:03 AM PDT by
Liberal Classic
(No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
To: Dimensio
I don't know the individuals, nor have I looked at, or followed their posts. So, I can't speak truthfully to the cases you've asked about.
But, lies, distortions, partial truths, restructuring of statistics to favor predetermined conclusions, fibs, are all but various forms of deception.
There is NOTHING that any Christian should hate any more than deception. Christ called Satan the Father of Lies, and indicated how we must be repulsed by lies as much as we are by Satan.
If ANY Christian knowingly repeats lies, slander, mistruths or the such, he/she will utimately undergo not just a 'peer review', but a 'superior review' that will have "Cataclysm" written all over the final page.
I don't like intellectual dishonesty. From either side.
How've you been doing? Beautiful day here in Colorado.
144 posted on
05/23/2005 9:57:07 AM PDT by
ColoCdn
(Neco eos omnes, Deus suos agnoset)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson