To: wallcrawlr
I disagree. Its entirely from a lack of civility.I am all for civility, and I try to keep my cutting remarks to a minimum, but neither side is particularly innocent of offense. However, I do not believe if these threads were made more polite through agressive moderation that they would attract more than a minority of posters.
135 posted on
05/23/2005 9:45:15 AM PDT by
Liberal Classic
(No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
To: Liberal Classic; PatrickHenry
So we are reduced to a flame war perpetrated by the latest news story.
Well, that's what it seems like.
I belive more people would show up for discussion if it were as you stated.
I wonder if thats what PH thinks when he posts this general statement to the begining of his threads. "Everybody be nice."
147 posted on
05/23/2005 10:02:14 AM PDT by
wallcrawlr
(http://www.bionicear.com)
To: Liberal Classic; PatrickHenry
Follow up to #147 with one more thing. In response the first part of your statement.
Yep, there was only one innocent man on this earth. He suffered for it.
The kind of civility I mean is a response to the consistent put downs, accusatory tones and remarks used to stifle discussion.
I'm not pointing out individuals (from any side of the aisle). I believe we could all recognize it when we saw it.
150 posted on
05/23/2005 10:11:52 AM PDT by
wallcrawlr
(http://www.bionicear.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson