What on earth are you babbling about? The explanation for him is that he's a charlatan. Yes, shocking as this revelation may seem to you, charlatans exist.
This sweeping under the rug of "well, isn't it nice that science showed that science was wrong" is awfully convenient.
Science didn't show that science was wrong. Please refer back to my post #110 about this statement. What science showed was that a scientist was wrong. To be more precise, it showed that a scientist probably fabricated claims.
If you're going to call Christians to task for the Ken Ham's of the world, you've got to answer for the Prof. Protsch's.
You have your answer, and only in your fevered imagination was anyone evading it.
Read post #125, and jump in on your detailed explanation, if you wish. The more the merrier.