To: Private_Sector_Does_It_Better
Amazing how their arguements supposedly in opposition to the "nuclear" option sound far more like reasons to vote FOR the nuclear option. Those same arguements are the very same ones that back up the use of said option - to protect the independence of the courts.
The courts, as they stand today, lean FAR to the Left in many cases. The courts are suppose to be strict interpreters of the Constitution - not legislators. This is exactly what most of GW's nominees would help do. Yet the Left wants the courts to fall even further left - and far LESS independent.
37 posted on
05/22/2005 5:22:21 PM PDT by
TheBattman
(Islam (and liberals)- the cult of Satan)
To: TheBattman
"Amazing how their arguments supposedly in opposition to the "nuclear" option sound far more like reasons to vote FOR the nuclear option."
They just don't "get" the fact that most American agree with us and not them.
39 posted on
05/22/2005 5:25:33 PM PDT by
Private_Sector_Does_It_Better
(The UN did such a fine job with "Oil for Food" in Iraq, let's let them run the whole country!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson