What a magnificently ignorant statement. To you, any history before the modern Nixonian overreach of federal law enforcement is "Nonsequitur." Out effin' standing!
What a magnificently ignorant statement. To you, any history before the modern Nixonian overreach of federal law enforcement is "Nonsequitur." Out effin' standing!
You take me out of context. The subject was about a declaration of war. The poster said that he witnessed the declaration of war for WWII. The poster implied that one has to listen to the WWII Congressional Declaration of War to understand what a constitutional declaration of war is.
It doesn't logically follow that one has to witness the declaration of war in WWII to be able to compare the declaration of war for Iraq to what is required by the Constitution.
That is a non sequitur.
You are a dunce.
"Nixonian overreach"
Scuze me?