An illegal leaves an obvious trail of clues: drives, but no license, works, but the employer can't verify citizenship, has no bank account, prepaid mobile phone with no fixed address, etc.
Any PI could reliably sniff out 90% of illegals. And heck, because I'm a nice guy, any illegal that has succeeded in buying a house can stay. They got hustle.
The fact remains, we DON'T need to be a surveillance state.
What is the result of building a surveillance state? It's military recruitment that is 8000 below quota. Our intrusive government can go to hell, or the bureaucrats snooping on me can fight for their own gravy train. I don't care, and my kids ain't goin'.
An illegal leaves an obvious trail of clues: drives, but no license, works, but the employer can't verify citizenship, has no bank account, prepaid mobile phone with no fixed address, etc.
How do you know if a person driving a car who is not exhibiting criminal behavior is an illegal alien who doesn't have a drivers license? Or are we randomly stopping people and asking for papers? Your response is stoopid (sic).
BTW, last I heard, employers who ask for citizenship papers as proof, are subject to law suits.
And heck, because I'm a nice guy,
Yeah, you're mister nice guy aren't you.