Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voters to decide on historic cross
WND ^ | May 21, 2005 | By James Lambert

Posted on 05/21/2005 9:58:14 PM PDT by BigFinn

The San Diego City Council voted this week to allow voters to decide the fate of the historic Mt. Soledad Cross overlooking the Pacific Ocean in La Jolla.

The vote represented the newest chapter in a long line of legal battles to remove the cross, led by ACLU attorney James McElroy, who represents an atheist seeking to remove the Christian symbol from public lands.

The legal battles date back to 1989.

Essentially, the voters will decide whether they want to transfer the property to the National Park System as a war memorial.

For more than 50 years, the site has been recognized by the public as a place where war veterans are honored for their service to the United States.

The Mt. Soledad Association manages the site where plaques recognize war veterans who served in the last century. Most of the veterans recognized are from the greater San Diego area.

Last November, two Republican congressmen from San Diego County, Rep. Duncan Hunter and Rep. Randy Cunningham, added a provision to an appropriations bill to allow the city to designate the site as a national war memorial.

If the citizens of San Diego agree with this proposal, the site will be maintained by the National Park System. The bill was signed into law by President Bush in December.

Representatives from the Mt. Soledad Association and the park system were in Washington last week to discuss a working plan to manage the site.

Opponents of the transfer, including the ACLU, contend it is illegal and unconstitutional. However, a lawyer for the Thomas More Center, Charles LiMandri, contends there is legal precedent for protecting religious symbols that already are on federal land.

While the debate on religious symbols on public land slowly is working its way through the courts, the proposition to transfer city property to the federal government will be decided by San Diego voters July 26.

San Diego Mayor Dick Murphy, who is leaving office in July, says "it may provoke additional litigation, but some things are worth fighting for."

Murphy was a supporter of a referendum that forced the city council to revisit the issue. The referendum sparked a record 89,000 petitions to request that the cross not be dismantled from its present site.

The initiative rescinded an earlier vote by the council that would have removed it.

The referendum, put together in just a month, was widely supported by San Diego radio talk-show hosts Roger Hedgecock, Rick Roberts and Mark Larson and Los Angeles host Paul McGuire.

Slightly more than 33,000 verified signatures were required for the referendum to be successful, based on a registered voter base of approximately 650,000 voters.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: aclu; cary; churchandstate; cross; mountsoledad; sandiego
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-223 next last
To: needsomereason

P.S. As to the apology thing: NUTS


21 posted on 05/21/2005 10:57:09 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: needsomereason
That's a pretty bad argument considering that cross has been their longer than we've had "under god" in our pledge of allegiance.

Read the first amendment.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

Now if you truely believe that we need to get rid of the cross based off of that then I submit to you that we need to demolish almost all of our national monuments in Washington DC because of Christian and Masonic symbols.
23 posted on 05/21/2005 10:58:00 PM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: needsomereason
No, that's just stupid.

Pretty much every other city or town in California would have to change its name in that case.Pretty much every other city or town in California would have to change its name in that case.

Okay, but if it were practical, don't you think those cities and towns should change their names?

What if San Diego were the only city in the U.S. named for a Christian figure, and no impractical precedent was being set...shouldn't San Diego then change its name, just on principle?

24 posted on 05/21/2005 10:59:28 PM PDT by T. Buzzard Trueblood ("I never got a job from a poor man." - Larry Gatlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: needsomereason

Bye Bye


25 posted on 05/21/2005 10:59:51 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: BigFinn

Mt. Soledad Veterans War Memorial - November 11, 2004.

26 posted on 05/21/2005 11:05:03 PM PDT by concentric circles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: needsomereason

You are absolutely correct- I misread. I thought that you were talking about "separation or church and state". Your reply was not incorrect.


27 posted on 05/21/2005 11:06:20 PM PDT by de Buillion (Jerusalem, 1099)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah
Wouldn't forcing someone to take down a cross be in violation of "prohibiting the free exercise thereof."?

Maybe it's just me but I've never heard a logical answer from a lib on that.

28 posted on 05/21/2005 11:06:40 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: needsomereason
...I disagree that the US was founded as a "Christian" country....Founding Fathers seem to have intentionally avoided any mention of "god"

Article. VII. The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America

Just whose Lord were they referring to?

29 posted on 05/21/2005 11:07:49 PM PDT by gdc314
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: needsomereason

The only apologies needed here are from those who were supposed to have taught you the history of this country and obviously failed miserabley. Read the document slowly. Or stay in Europe. Your choice.


30 posted on 05/21/2005 11:08:20 PM PDT by Adrastus (If you don't like my attitude, talk to someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BigFinn

The people sign petitions to get it on the ballad.







No, on a BALLOT.


31 posted on 05/21/2005 11:09:10 PM PDT by onyx (Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: needsomereason
This hysteria against symbols of faith surfaced as recently as the last quarter or so of the 20th century. A truly tolerant and enlightened approaoch would honor all faiths and disparage none - in theory, anyway. Again, the prohibition against an established church of a particular denomination of a specific religion does not mean we must abandon all reference to faith in the public forum. You'd better get ready to demolish, raze to the ground, most of the historic buildings and monuments in DC, to include the Washington Monument, which can be construed to have religious connotations. Get out the old sandblaster and cleanse the buildings of murals and foundational quotations which might have a religious reference. Just like the Taliban destroying the millenia old statues of Buddha because they found them offensive. How about showing some real maturity and tolerance here.
36 posted on 05/21/2005 11:22:53 PM PDT by ArmyTeach (Pray daily for our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: needsomereason

Telling you anything is a study in futility. That much is obvious. I said "Your Choice." Somehow that just doesn't sound like "telling you what to do."


37 posted on 05/21/2005 11:25:47 PM PDT by Adrastus (If you don't like my attitude, talk to someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: needsomereason

Why post to me? I have no credibility, remember?


40 posted on 05/21/2005 11:31:28 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-223 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson