Posted on 05/21/2005 9:33:04 PM PDT by doug from upland
Edited on 05/25/2005 7:32:12 PM PDT by Lead Moderator. [history]
For this trial, they are after Rosen. He may or may not turn on Hillary. Just wait for the fun at the civil trial. Hillary will get another perjury opportunity.
And a few FREepers objected when I called her Satan's Daughter in 2001 at the C-SPAN televised FReeper Victory Brunch.
I'll look forward to reading it~
I can understand the Clinton-appointed judge not wanting her name mentioned. But if the prosecutor was really doing his job, he would be calling producer Gary Smith. Rosen was at the Le Dome lunch in which Smith announced that his fee was 850K. Hillary called Smith that night to ask him to lower it by 50K. Smith should be an interesting witness in the civil trial. Let's hope he is in good health and doesn't have one of those accidents.
"I called her Satan's Daughter in 2001 at the C-SPAN televised FReeper Victory Brunch."
Doug, do you have a source for that? LOL I mean, a video clip?
The Victory Brunch brings back great memories. I almost forget that, among the Golden Kneepad Awards, was one that I wanted to award posthumously to Alan Dershowitz, but he wouldn't cooperate. People actually thought that was over the top.
BOOKMARKED. The amount of story material the MSM has spiked about surely the most evil administration in US History is astonishing.
With all these scoops STILL waiting to be published by our fine Fourth Estate, but mostly what we heard about then was Monica and the latest weather...one MUST conclude that there is a Vast Left Wing Conspiracy.
People who support the Leftists with subscriptions, pageviews and advertisements aid and abet them. And people who support those ADVERTISERS do likewise....
A "Sunday Morning and the truth shall set us free from her" BUMP!
AMEN! Preach It! Shout it from the housetops!
(FReeping with KWVE radio on, awesome Calvary Chapel station/network)
I've been wondering if we should thank Lazio, in maybe just one small way, for approaching Her Thighness at that debate. The question was about hard money, so if he hadn't done so- she might not have felt so pressed for illegal $, and there would be not much of a scandal here. I think his campaign was ineptly run otherwise.
Fox News ran a segment today about the scandal. I think twice, it was stated tht the prosecution said Hillary was not involved. Why do people continue to protect her sorry butt.?
Wow! DFU, when do you sleep?! You are awesome, and we're grateful to you and for you.
bump ping lookout!!!
What is sleep?
HUGE DFU BUMP to the TOP!
BULLS' EYE!
"Before meeting with the President and first lady, Peter Paul had been vetted about six times. It seems that the first couple should have known at least a little about him."
I believe you are closing in on the Clintons, finally. No thanks to their good friend, GW Bush. -- FRegards....
http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:L8euHWwoM8gJ:www.renewamerica.us/archives/speeches/pdf/96_11_03au.pdf+pardon+%22dan+lassiter%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
Speech at American University by Alan Keyes:
...That's the pardon issue, by the way. No, it is! You make a wonderful commercial, in which you talk about the fact that he's thinking about pardoning some people, and then you examine his record on pardons. And prominently feature Mr. Lassiter. You know? That was the first question I remember really bothering me about this administration: why did he pardon Dan Lassiter?
Does somebody here have an answer to that question? Why do you pardon a convicted cocaine dealer? Why do you feel so buddy-buddy with him that you want to make absolutely sure that he can go back to work? This doesn't compute! It doesn't make sense! Unless you finally begin to recognize the true character of the people you're dealing with. But why wasn't all this used? Not a single one of these little tidbits--and there are many more--were really brought before the American people. Why? Why?! I've been asking myself this question for weeks.
And I think the answer's very simple. I think that we actually have common ground among the elites in this country right now. They have agreed- -all of them--that they wish to drive the moral concerns of the American people out of our political life, or redefine issues in such a way that we do not have to deal with those concerns. I'm not sure what their motives are. I think they're very afraid of those moral issues, because, after all, moral issues are the ones that end up tearing people apart. [snip]
Coming out from under the weekend laundry and vacuum cleaner hoses and cords, I do enjoy good entertainment this fine Monday morning.
Thank you for all you are doing, gentlemen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.