To: gutted catfish; MeekOneGOP
riiiiggghhhhtttttt....
ozone?
2 posted on
05/21/2005 9:08:25 AM PDT by
MikefromOhio
(I joined the EEEVVIILLLL Sam's Club on Friday, April 22nd, 2005.....)
To: MikeinIraq
"...since they will be in the minority someday and I'm sure they will wish they had." Just how many microseconds would it have taken for the Democrat majority to have implemented the "Nuclear Option" to pound down a recalcitrant Republican minority?
In the MSM, it would have been another, "Nothing to see here. Move along." day.
41 posted on
05/21/2005 9:28:50 AM PDT by
NicknamedBob
("What's with Modern Music? If I want screaming and shrieking, I can go home to my family." - George)
To: MikeinIraq
Semantics........there has NEVER been a JUDICIAL nominee FILABUSTERED that had a MAJORITY of SENATORS in line to vote for him. It is a common practice for DIMs to tell half truths on an issue like this.
The examples given in this article are bogus, none of the nominees would have passed with an up or down vote because a MAJORITY of SENATORS would have voted AGAINST them.
BIG BIG difference!!!
57 posted on
05/21/2005 9:52:57 AM PDT by
PISANO
(We will not tire......We will not falter.......We will NOT FAIL!!! .........GW Bush [Oct 2001])
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson