Posted on 05/20/2005 8:52:48 PM PDT by Dubya
Army recruiter Chad Christenson has sent 60 new soldiers off to basic training in the last two years.
Every day, he works the phones in his northwest San Antonio recruiting office, talking up the Army to young prospects. He visits San Antonio schools and shopping malls in his quest to meet his goal: two "quality" appointments arranged by the end of each day.
But rising combat casualties in Iraq make parents nervous. And increasing complaints about unethical recruiting tactics have made the Army an even harder sell sending enlistments plunging for the first time in five years.
(Excerpt) Read more at dallasnews.com ...

J. MICHAEL SHORT/Special Contributor
Sgt. Chad Christenson, an Army recruiter in San Antonio, says parents are a difficult sell.
But the facts don't really fit their hype -- our standards are still very high and we're still enlisting most all the soldiers we need. Retention is also strong. So there just isn't as much bad news as they'd like.
So are enlistments actually lower? Or just not increasing at the intended rate?
And remember, the figures above only apply to the Army (the Marines are similar). The Air Force and Navy are still fully meeting their goals.
Sign-up required...to read ? Most likely...
Yeah, it's called Stop-Loss. Recruitment is the final test of voluntary armies and elective wars.
USAF and USN had plenty of volunteers during Vietnam too. Ever wonder why people would choose those roles over Army or Marines during a war?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.