Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: iconoclast

"'splain to us why the Bush administration took off after a toothless, secular, despot of a ruined semi-nation instead of pursuing bin Laden or extinguishing the Wahhabi root of the terrorist plague.

You Bush-bot apologists make me puke!"

That you suffer a disconnect in geo-political reality is a right you have. You merely prove my point of your shared elitist point of view with the far left, because you spew it, makes it so.

It appears ignorance and skewed perceptions of reality are not simply the purview of the fringe left. The full scope of that reality, from the spineless UN's inaction to the Oil for Food Scandal (bribery) to self-interest of 'supposed allies', would take far more time than I care to expend in educating one who cannot express themselves beyond vitriolic rhetorical talking points. Your pusillanimous talking points of 'going after the Wahabbi (or Wahhabbi - both spellings are accepted) sect', without any sound reason of how that could be done, is further evidence of your ideological entrenchemnt. How would you make such a frontal assault ? How would you avoid negative ramifications and fallout ?

While I defend your right to regurgitate your vituperative talking points, I conclude you actually have no syllogistic defense of your position.


389 posted on 05/21/2005 11:09:59 AM PDT by KMAJ2 (Freedom not defended is freedom relinquished, liberty not fought for is liberty lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]


To: KMAJ2
That you suffer a disconnect in geo-political reality is a right you have. You merely prove my point of your shared elitist point of view with the far left, because you spew it, makes it so.

I take it you disagree with me?

It appears ignorance and skewed perceptions of reality are not simply the purview of the fringe left. The full scope of that reality, from the spineless UN's inaction to the Oil for Food Scandal (bribery) to self-interest of 'supposed allies', would take far more time than I care to expend in educating one who cannot express themselves beyond vitriolic rhetorical talking points.

When and if you finish venting your spleen, do you actually have anything at all to counter my argument? That blurb obviously belongs in some other thread.

Your pusillanimous talking points of 'going after the Wahabbi (or Wahhabbi - both spellings are accepted) sect', without any sound reason of how that could be done, is further evidence of your ideological entrenchemnt.

You have a real knack for stuffing a handful of six bit words into a pointless sentence or paragraph.

I would simply, to get back to the real world, ask you where the root of the problem lies, if not with the Wahabbis?

How would you make such a frontal assault ? How would you avoid negative ramifications and fallout ?

Those of course were the same questions that confronted the responsible parties in the GWB administration before their pointless adventure in Iraq. Now we are months and months, billions and billions, and thousands of brave young bodies deeper into fruitless nonsense.

And the ROOT remains untouched, unrecognized, and stronger than ever. To make matters worse, their recruiting efforts are enhanced, ours are diminished.

While I defend your right to regurgitate your vituperative talking points, I conclude you actually have no syllogistic defense of your position.

My reply is simply .... "back at yuh"!

399 posted on 05/21/2005 6:57:51 PM PDT by iconoclast (Conservative, not partisan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson