Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: iconoclast
I cannot believe you need to even ask the question.

Bush took off after Iraq because:

1. Security agencies of many countries (including ours) thought he had WMD.

2. Sadam had declared himself an enemy of the USA, and had sent assassins to get Bush 41.

3. Iraq was harboring terrorists.

5. There was fairly good intelligence that Iraq had funded terorists.

6. Iraq was the Middle Eastern equivalent of the Third Reich, and were torturing and killing people in mass quantities.

All of this was discussed at the UN in the run-up to the war.

225 posted on 05/20/2005 4:58:11 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]


To: Miss Marple
I cannot believe you need to even ask the question. Bush took off after Iraq because: 1. Security agencies of many countries (including ours) thought he had WMD. 2. Sadam had declared himself an enemy of the USA, and had sent assassins to get Bush 41. 3. Iraq was harboring terrorists. 5. There was fairly good intelligence that Iraq had funded terorists. 6. Iraq was the Middle Eastern equivalent of the Third Reich, and were torturing and killing people in mass quantities. All of this was discussed at the UN in the run-up to the war.

I like and respect you Miss Marple but you embarrass yourself with this persistent denial. Not even the administration continues to defend this drivel.

228 posted on 05/20/2005 5:06:37 PM PDT by iconoclast (Conservative, not partisan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson