Skip to comments.
Iraq: Pictures show Saddam Hussein in his underwear
Reuters ^
| 05/20/05
Posted on 05/20/2005 9:43:31 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster
The quality of the Sun's topless models has seriously worsened.
21
posted on
05/20/2005 10:10:22 AM PDT
by
Oztrich Boy
(Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the blind obedience of fools - Solon, Lawmaker of Athens)
To: Oztrich Boy
Re #21
Right. Now one of them grows mustache and chest hairs.:-) The Sun must have decided to go for 'freak show' to corner the market.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Helen: "God, he's a stud! I haven't been this turned on since I dated Warren Harding!"
23
posted on
05/20/2005 10:23:52 AM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(The theory of evolution is the great cosmogenic myth of the twentieth century - Michael Denton)
To: reagan_fanatic; Chieftain
LOL!!
I am going to sue the Sun newspaper for traumatic emotional damage and nightmares because I saw this image!!!!! UGH....Thanks for sharing!
24
posted on
05/20/2005 10:29:57 AM PDT
by
Recovering Ex-hippie
(Everything I need to know about Islam I learned on 9-11!)
To: hipaatwo
"Why is there a lock on the inside of where he is? "Good question. Wanna bet this turns out to be a fake? Perhaps a photoshopped picture?
To: TigerLikesRooster
Alright, which one of you picture doctoring geniuses put Saddams head on Hillary's neck???
26
posted on
05/20/2005 10:47:25 AM PDT
by
F.J. Mitchell
(The House of Representatives serves people-The Senate serves Senators.)
To: sgtbono2002
I don't care what the man wears underneath his clothes, and this pic is in poor taste. Clinton grosses me out. I just am so tired of this tasteless pics. The sun should find something else to write about.
To: F.J. Mitchell; All
We demand they put Hillary's head back on her neck!
28
posted on
05/20/2005 10:50:09 AM PDT
by
F.J. Mitchell
(The House of Representatives serves people-The Senate serves Senators.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I _really_ didn't need to see that...
To: TigerLikesRooster
Shock! Horror! Yawn! Nothing so egregious has ever been perpetrated anywhere in the world! And especially not by the media!!
30
posted on
05/20/2005 10:53:48 AM PDT
by
Puddleglum
(Thank God the Boston blowhard lost)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Did you all hear the Communist news network say that these pictures could be against the Geneva Convention?
31
posted on
05/20/2005 10:55:17 AM PDT
by
rambo316
To: Marysecretary
Seriously, I hope I look that fit at 70!
32
posted on
05/20/2005 10:57:24 AM PDT
by
pickemuphere
(Leviticus 13:3)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Say what you want, the Guy's sporting a package that wouldn't fit under the average Christmas tree.
33
posted on
05/20/2005 11:00:06 AM PDT
by
keat
(Click to hear theme song)
To: Normal4me
Truly.
He looks fairly spry for a guy pushing 80. As I noticed immediatley and a freeper mentioned earlier, do they actually let him color his hair in captivity?
As I recall his hair was growing in when he was captured.
This picture does not ring true. Surprise surprise.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Ya gotta love this picture from the "Arab Street"...
They're laughing at him!
35
posted on
05/20/2005 11:31:36 AM PDT
by
Redcloak
(Over 16,000 served.)
To: keat
Say what you want, the Guy's sporting a package that wouldn't fit under the average Christmas tree.
36
posted on
05/20/2005 11:40:17 AM PDT
by
pickemuphere
(Leviticus 13:3)
To: TigerLikesRooster
[SQUINT! SQUEEZE! GROAN! *pant pant*]
Man, try as I might I just can't seem to conjure up much sympathy for ol' Saddam.
37
posted on
05/20/2005 11:45:47 AM PDT
by
MozamFreepinBique
(I certainly CAN prove to you there's a God, but I'd have to kill you.)
To: Steve_Seattle
it's inconceivable that the military would have that attitude. It only takes one. But you're right, the resistance isn't from the Baathists, but from Mohammedan nutjobs.
38
posted on
05/20/2005 11:49:18 AM PDT
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: Normal4me
Good question. Wanna bet this turns out to be a fake? Perhaps a photoshopped picture? May very well be. If the Pentagon could get their hands on the file, I'm sure they could tell.
39
posted on
05/20/2005 11:51:49 AM PDT
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: pickemuphere
I agree. He doesn't look all that bad. Too bad he's evil.
40
posted on
05/20/2005 12:02:17 PM PDT
by
Marysecretary
(Thank you, Lord, for FOUR MORE YEARS!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson