Skip to comments.
Iraq: Pictures show Saddam Hussein in his underwear
Reuters ^
| 05/20/05
Posted on 05/20/2005 9:43:31 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster
2
posted on
05/20/2005 9:48:32 AM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
To: TigerLikesRooster
They once asked Clinton if he wore Boxers or Jockeys, at least they wont have to ask Saddam.
IMO the Sun somehow got hold of these pictures, saw a chance to embarass the US and ran with it, The story that the US military gave these pictures to them is so much horse dung.
To: TigerLikesRooster
so he was getting changed....With all the hoopla about it I was expecting something worse.
4
posted on
05/20/2005 9:51:56 AM PDT
by
tfecw
(Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Wonder how many woman will be writing to him asking to marry him after seeing that picture?
5
posted on
05/20/2005 9:54:38 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(It's frustrating when you know all the answers, but nobody bothers to ask you the questions.)
To: TigerLikesRooster; All
At least the underwear isn't on his head....
I DO have to ask:
WHY is he being supplied with "Just For Men"?
Let the Arab world see him as he really IS: a broken-down old despot!
6
posted on
05/20/2005 9:55:21 AM PDT
by
tiamat
(Can't sleep...clowns will get me..can't sleep...clowns will get me...can't sleep....clowns will get)
To: b4its2late
Some will.
count on it.
YUCK!
7
posted on
05/20/2005 9:55:57 AM PDT
by
tiamat
(Can't sleep...clowns will get me..can't sleep...clowns will get me...can't sleep....clowns will get)
To: TigerLikesRooster
8
posted on
05/20/2005 9:56:09 AM PDT
by
kevkrom
("Those who stand for nothing fall for anything." -- Alexander Hamilton)
To: tiamat
I know. Scott Peterson comes to mind.....
9
posted on
05/20/2005 9:56:53 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(It's frustrating when you know all the answers, but nobody bothers to ask you the questions.)
To: cake_crumb
Looks like he's lost a little weight!
10
posted on
05/20/2005 9:57:09 AM PDT
by
Marysecretary
(Thank you, Lord, for FOUR MORE YEARS!!!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Saddam in his underwear!
I guess that justifies World War III.
News at 6.
11
posted on
05/20/2005 9:57:18 AM PDT
by
MikeHu
To: TigerLikesRooster
Here's hoping the future will find Saddam as well hung as he appears in this picture.
12
posted on
05/20/2005 9:58:32 AM PDT
by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
To: All
Clearly, the press is throwing a temper tantrum because of the recent Newsweek debacle in which the press took exception with the WH making suggestions to Newsweek about how to repair the damage.
The press ain't gonna be dictated to by a Repub President who is an idiot!
So now it's all-out war and the press is going to print as many articles as they can to embarrass this President......our national security and the troops be damned!
Too bad this isn't WWII...FDR would throw their arses in the pokey.
To: cake_crumb
"The Sun quoted U.S. military sources as saying they had handed over the pictures "in the hope of dealing a body blow to the resistance in Iraq"."
That doesn't pass the smell test. After Abu Ghraib, it's inconceivable that the military would have that attitude.
To: TigerLikesRooster
I sure hope the source of this picture is sniffed out....and SOON!
No doubt it's another disgruntled Clinton holdover in the Pentagon.
To: TigerLikesRooster
16
posted on
05/20/2005 10:05:20 AM PDT
by
OXENinFLA
("And that [Atomic] bomb is a filibuster" ~~~ Sen. Lieberman 1-4-95)
To: Steve_Seattle
"The Sun quoted U.S. military sources as saying they had handed over the pictures "in the hope of dealing a body blow to the resistance in Iraq"."
To complete my thought: It should probably should say "this was handed over by opponents of the Bush administration in the hope of fanning the insurgency and moving Iraq closer to civil war." I would bet the ranch that this was NOT released by an official military source, nor was it released for the stated reason, which is utterly illogical.
To: sgtbono2002
Look at the pic closely. He's supposed to be a prisoner. Why is there a lock on the inside of where he is? Am I wrong or does it look like he could just let himself out of the room?
18
posted on
05/20/2005 10:06:35 AM PDT
by
hipaatwo
(When you're in trouble you want all your friends around you...preferably armed!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Did we learn from Abu Graib that the "most humiliating thing" you could do to a Muslim was to show them in their underwear? Or was it flush the Koran in their presence? Or was it taking orders from a woman? I forget.
Sort of like how the press tells us that the "most humiliating thing" you can do to a black man is call him "boy"? Or was it spit in his face? Or confirm Janice Rogers Brown? I forget which because they keep changing it to fit whatever outrage is in the storyline for that week.
Bottom line, there must be hundreds of "most humiliating things" the press can make up and get a few of their lib toadies to agree with.
19
posted on
05/20/2005 10:07:43 AM PDT
by
Tall_Texan
(If you can think 180-degrees apart from reality, you might be a Democrat.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
The US needs to check first with Ahmad Chalabi. I remember seeing one of his friends with a digital camera in hand when Chalabi was shown in a video as the first Iraqi to visit Saddam in prison. Check it out!! Wish I could find that video.
20
posted on
05/20/2005 10:08:37 AM PDT
by
W04Man
(Bush2004 Grassroots Campaign We Did It! Now on to 2008: http://Allen4President.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson